Category Archives: What If Nobody Told You?

Just Ask For Forgiveness

Something very important is happening on December 31st of this year – something that might impact your life, or the lives of your friends, family or co-workers.

What am I talking about?

The expiration of the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act.  The expiration of the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act.  As your real estate expert, I talked about the Act in a previous Coffee Break Newsletter.

Oddly enough, many homeowners (including those affected by the Act) are unaware of its existence, or of its ticking clock.

The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act applies to debt relief “forgiven” between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2012. At this point in time, it does not appear the Act will be extended.

What’s really at stake? Money!

Let’s take a step backwards to put this in perspective.

Debt “relief” comes about when a lender “forgives” debt owed by a borrower, as can happen with a short sale, foreclosure, or other type of loan “workout”. Ordinarily, that forgiven amount is taxable. However, under the Act, the borrower’s need to pay taxes on the amount of the forgiven debt is eliminated.

Of course, there are caveats that come along with this tax relief. For example, the debt must be related to a principal residence. In addition, the total amount of the debt can’t exceed the borrower’s original mortgage loan … plus the cost of improvements made to the home.

The implications of this tax relief are huge in dollars and cents! Take a look at an example.

In 2006, Mary Jones bought a home for $375,000 and took out a mortgage of $265,000. This month Mary is relocated across the country for work and must sell her home. Her current mortgage balance is $237,000. Luckily for Mary, her lender is a bank that is willing to work with her on a short sale … and she is lucky enough to find a buyer.
Mary and her buyer agree to a sales price of $218,000. However, that amount falls short of what Mary needs to pay off her mortgage, and pay closing costs – all of which is estimated to come to $227,620. Since Mary does not have enough money to bring to the closing table, Mary’s lender agrees to the short sale, forgiving debt in the amount of $9,260.

Prior to the Act, Mary would have been required to declare the $9,260 as income, and pay taxes on it. Under the current provisions of the Act, taxes on Mary’s $9,260 in relief are forgiven. For individuals in a 20% tax bracket, that’s almost $2,500 in tax savings!

And owners of high-end homes – defaults of which are on the rise — could be looking at very substantial tax breaks, depending on the amount of debt forgiven.

Which leads to several questions my clients have repeatedly raised about the Act:

  • What is the maximum amount of debt relief under the Act? Up to $2 million may be forgiven for married couples ($1 million if single or if married but filing separately); of course, this must be for a principal residence. If there is debt forgiven above this amount the borrower is taxed at ordinary income rates.
  • Does the Act apply to cars, boats, second homes, investment properties, credit cards, or other debt? Not under this provision. Only debt relief for a principal residence applies under the Act, however, bankruptcy debt relief is non-taxable, and that is sometimes true for insolvency as well.
  • Do I have to report the forgiven debt, since I won’t be paying taxes on it? Yes! See the IRS and/or your tax professional for additional details.

I’m not suggesting that you hurry up and default on your mortgage loan so you can take advantage of the Act. However, it is important that you understand the implications of the Act and how it may affect you.

I encourage you to contact qualified professionals (such as attorneys or Certified Public Accountants) who can assist you with this program.  I have names of trusted service providers.  I also suggest you visit the IRS site for information on the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act, which can be found on the IRS’s website. I used information from that site, in addition to information provided by NAR in preparing this blog post for you.

Most people are not aware of the Act’s existence, and pending expiration.  Call me at 425-330-0663 for more information on this important and expiring topic. Or just click here!

FHA Loan Limits Reinstated

FHA Loan Limites Reinstated

Congress has reinstated the loan limit formula and maximum cap for Federal Housing Administration-insured loans through 2013. Those loan limits previously expired September 30.

The new provision allows loan limits to go back to125 percent of local area median home prices up to a maximum of $729,750 in the highest cost markets through 2013. Loan limits for Fannie Mae- and Freddie Mac-insured mortgages will remain at 115 percent of local area median home prices, up to $625,500.

These reinstated loan limits will help make mortgages more affordable and accessible for hard-working families throughout the country. In fact, according to FHA, 60 percent of people who used an FHA loan that was higher than the lower loan limits (before the loan limits reverted on October 1) had combined household incomes of below $100,000.

Top 10 Cities: Green Living, Health, Air Quality and Other Stuff!

Top 10 Cities: Green Living, Health, Air Quality and Other Stuff!

Top 10 Overall:

  • San Francisco
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Seattle
  • Boston
  • New York City
  • Minneapolis
  • Denver
  • Portland, Ore
  • Los Angeles
  • Chicago

These cities earned the highest combined scores. In order to earn a spot on this list, cities had to rank highly on positive lists (such as “best public transit”) and rank low or not at all on negative lists (such as “worst allergies”).

Top 10 Most Frequent List Appearances

  • New York
  • San Francisco
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Seattle
  • Boston
  • Minneapolis
  • Denve
  • Los Angeles
  • Chicago
  • Miami

These cities showed up most frequently on the lists featured in Scientific American’s top 10 cities lists for the past four days (green living, health, air quality, technology). New York City, the overall winner, appeared on more than 60 percent of all the collected lists, whereas the cities that tied for second earned spots on almost half the lists; the third-place cities showed up in the rankings about 30 percent of the time.

Not all of the lists on which these overall scores are based were created using conventional statistical or scientific methods, therefore their validity should be suspect. We have presented this information mainly for discussion. Scientific American gathered the lists from several online sources. To earn a place on the “overall performance” list, cities had to appear on multiple lists, and earned points based on their rankings. Each city’s points were added up to arrive at the overall score. A high rank on a positive list such as “best public transit” earned a city points whereas a spot on a negative list such as “worst allergies” detracted points. Each city’s points added up to its overall score.

What do you think?  I can speak for a couple of these cities.  How about you?  I’d love your comments.