How can one man lift a big rock?

How can one man lift a big rock?  Why does Donald Trump win so often in high-stakes negotiations?  How can you buy five income producing properties with very little of your own money?

You’ve heard me talk about it often.  It’s leverage.  Let’s take a quick look at why the concept of leverage is so crucial to growing wealthy. Leverage is the ability to use a small amount of your own money to control an asset of far greater value. For example, when you put down 20% on the purchase of a single family residential home, you are essentially using the bank’s money to extend your own buying power.

Assume that you have $100,000 cash to invest. You could find a $100,000 house and purchase it outright. A better idea would be to find five single family residential properties each costing $100,000. Rather than plow all your resources into one property, put down 20% on all five, let the bank loan you the rest, and suddenly you have a portfolio of five income producing properties.

If you’ve done your homework and chosen appropriate deals that provide positive cash flow immediately, you’re sitting in the proverbial catbird seat. Later, you’ll refinance all five loans in seven to twelve years and use the resulting proceeds to buy as many properties as you have the down payments to afford. You should NEVER pay off your loans, but rather frequently refinance into more and larger real estate deals.

Here’s the reality of this type of investing. You use other people’s money (OPM) to buy assets that you will eventually own. Along the way, you also use OPM to cover the monthly expense of your investment, which is the mortgage payment. How do you do this?

By renting the place out! Assuming the deal is right, which it should be when you do your homework, a tenant’s monthly rent payment should cover the mortgage, all associated expenses, and still leave you with a little cash in your pocket. This is called positive cash flow.

Here’s the bottom line. There is no other asset which allows you to rent it out! Don’t try this in the precious metals market or on Wall Street. They’ll laugh you out of the place.

Let’s grab a cup of coffee and discuss the how investing can help you with your wealth goals!  Call me anytime at 425-330-0663.

Finance Multiple Properties!

Hey all my investor friends, do you know most lenders will not do any new loan for any borrower that owns multiple financed properties?  However, I know lenders that will finance all the way up to Ten Financed Properties with a Conventional Loan.   Not all lenders will do this.  In fact, most won’t touch it.

They have great terms including no point loans. Please call me or email me if you have any questions regarding Investor Loan products.  My team is closing most of our FHA loans now in less than 20 days and we are still offering same day approvals including evening and weekends.    Call me anytime for details!

Plan now for your housing concerns after retirement and beyond

Do you remember when 50 was waaaay old? I sure do. Now it seems rather youthful eh! Anyway, one of the major decisions facing us “older folks” is where to live in our later years.

Anyone over 60 (not me – yet) who has grown children should be developing a plan for where to live when they’re 75, 85 and even older. Like solid retirement-investment programs, your housing plan can be sidetracked by all sorts of things like recessions and personal issues. The downturn in the Seattle housing market and nationwide of the last few years doesn’t help, either.

When it comes to housing decisions, it’s been shown that people, who thought about the issue and planned accordingly, fared better when it came to housing decisions. In a 2009 study, Boston College’s Center for Retirement Research analyzed information about moves made between 1992 and 2004 by people who were 51 to 61.

The study looked at all moves made during the period and reviewed the reasons people gave for relocating. Those who tended to be in control of their own move were classified as planners. They tended to move to get a better location or home because of retirement or financial reasons.

People who said they had been forced to move because of family or health issues — the death of a spouse, a divorce, poor health — were classified as reactors.

Having a financial cushion is, of course, a big help in providing some control over the timing of their move and the ability to carry out their plan even when things go less than perfect. It should come as no surprise that setting aside money to complete a move should be part of your plan. But so should doing some homework:

• Where do you want to live?
• What’s the housing market like there?
• How will the cost of homeownership change in your new home?
• Can you afford these outlays in retirement?
• What’s the minimum amount you need to get from selling your current home?
• What’s the likelihood of receiving this amount, and are there home-improvement projects you need to undertake to increase the net proceeds from selling your home?

In the study, planners tended to have choices and fared better even if confronted with the kinds of problems that forced reactors to move. Reactors didn’t have the same range of choices.

“Those moving for retirement reasons are more educated, better off financially, more likely to be married and less likely to be in poor/fair health,” researchers said. “Those moving for health or family reasons have the lowest educational-attainment level, the highest incidence of poor/fair health and the lowest level of income and wealth, as measured by Social Security, housing and nonhousing wealth.”

Reactors lost an average of $26,000 in home equity when they moved. That’s explained, in part, by the fact that a third of them did not buy another home and either rented or moved in with relatives.

Planners, by contrast, gained an average of $33,000 in home equity when they moved, and only 18% of them did not buy another home. They had more choice and control and wound up improving their financial situation.

Older people who felt forced to move tended to include those who were recently widowed or divorced and those diagnosed with a new health condition, researchers said. “Surprisingly, the other shocks — being hospitalized or reporting worsened health, entering into a nursing home and losing a job — do not significantly impact the probability of moving in these households with at least one shock. Thus, again, it seems that family structure is a very important factor in these households’ decisions to move.”

During the period studied, about 30% of older people moved out of their homes, and major factors cited were family considerations, financial matters, wanting a better location or type of house and retirement.

Health was not cited as a major cause of moves, but researchers speculated that this might be because even the oldest people included in the study were only 73 when it ended.

Among people who moved, about 60% stayed within 20 miles of their former home, 20% moved up to 200 miles away and a comparable number moved farther away. A mass exodus to sunnier locales was not a major driver of relocation decisions. Aging in place continued to be the overwhelming first choice.

Many of our clients are facing some of the issues I mention here. Many have parents or others they really care about. If you or someone you think could use our assistance, please introduce them to us. We’d love to help.

How will you deal with the demographic tsunami that may be on its way to Seattle?

How will you deal with the demographic tsunami that may be on its way to Seattle and beyond?

The first boomers have already turned 65, and every day for the next couple of decades another 10,000 people will do the same, according to data from the Pew Research Center. By 2030, 18 percent of America will be 65 or older, taking the Early Bird dinner special and slowly siphoning off their savings.

The front end of the baby boomer generation is starting to take money out, and that could become a big headwind for the stock market.

For six decades the boomers have driven everything in society, and that’s only going to continue. They can no longer afford to buy stocks for the long run and wait out any bust. They’re focusing less on capital appreciation and more on income, and we’re seeing that trend take hold already. Read more. .

Seattle On Top Ten list – Best Run Cities

Seattle On Top Ten list – Best Run Cities

The financial press’ favorite pastime, compiling lists, has produced yet another Top Ten product, 24/7 Wallstreet’s Best and Worst Run Cities.

Seattle makes the list at number seven on the list of Best Run Cities. Do you agree?

In compiling those lists, 24/7 Wall Street considered violent crime rates, poverty, the citizenry’s education achievement and the city’s credit rating.

The rating cities Seattle’s poverty rate (14th lowest), its high educational achievement (7th), its Aaa credit rating and its 43rd ranking on violent crime.

The city’s achievement was particularly noteworthy because all of the other cities on the Best Run list were much smaller with several such as Plano, Tex. (10th), Scottsdale, Ariz. (8th) and Irvine, Calif (2nd) being well-to-do suburbs without the typical urban crime and  poverty issue that come with being a larger central city like Seattle.

Tops on the list was Virginia Beach, Va.  On the Worst Run list, Miami was number one followed by Detroit and Newark, N.J.